Thursday, February 27, 2020

Apply the Learning Curve Theory Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Apply the Learning Curve Theory - Assignment Example Conversely, the third concept states that the interval of progress is predictable over a given time (Ninio, 2002). There has been an increase in the practice of performance in a manner in which the number of units of production increases in a compact span of time, ideally, after the particular time of implementation. This can categorically be defined as the interval of learning where persistent proportion of diminution in time is considered. In the same context, the slope of the learning curve is measured by the difference between the interval of learning and arithmetical rate of one hundred (James, 2005). For instance, if the timing between the increasing of units are decreased by 20 percent, then it will be represented as 80 percent learning curve. It is also worth to note that learning curves are used by individuals in preparing corporate strategy including setting prices, capital investment, and operative costs amid other things. I spent the first two weeks examining the operatio ns at Becks. For the last week, the tables had high utilization of 95 percent. The waiting time, I jotted down, ranged between 10 to 11 minutes. I noticed that some customers left without eating. The upper tolerance level was seven minutes for the customers to be awaited. The customers arrived in pair or two at the restaurant. Utilizing the peak performance would be very profitable to the restaurant. During the peak hours from 5 p.m. to 9p.m., I noticed, could have a turnover of two tables every 45 minutes. The restaurant had the capacity of 5 tables that could sit 16 people each. Come to think of it, the goal objective of the restaurant is to maximize profits, and stay under the upper tolerance of seven minutes. During peaks times, I noted that the entire process the customer walked into the restaurant to the time they left took them 45 minutes. The ten minutes were consumed just to be seated at an empty table. Another 15 minutes were consumed back in the kitchen doling out the ord er. This efficiency is below average going by the long waits and the number of customers who goo with being served. The reason that could be attributed to this may be because there was no computerized order process system. If this was in place, it could have speeded up the order process by four minutes. The restaurant also lacked automatic ovens which could have speeded up the process of preparing a pizza. The only solution to reducing the process time is to replace the manual ovens, and replace them with an automated order process. The crucial thing to do is to change the seating at the restaurant. At the start, the tables for four showed the highest utilization of 95 percent and 35 groups left the restaurant without being served. To solve this problem, the restaurant I concluded needed to change the distribution of tables, and hence establish a precedence rule. This would be a good decision. If the restaurant could make this decision, the utilization for four could significantly c hange to 93.67 percent, and tables for two could also change to 90 percent. Ten groups of four and three groups of two walked out without being served. The average waiting time could change to 4.68 minutes and the average waiting queue length would change to 3.50. The restaurant could earn an estimated profit of $1260, loss sales worth $358. Nevertheless, this would not be an optimal solution as the kitchen staff and waiting staff are underutilized. There are lost sales worth $358. Therefore making

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

To what extent is religious fundamentalism an anti-modern ideology Coursework

To what extent is religious fundamentalism an anti-modern ideology - Coursework Example Within such a way, a person who ascribes to a modernist theory or interpretation is of the belief that situational factors as well as the development of knowledge have a powerful impact on determining the norms and mores of whatever world view they may hold (Eccleshall, 1994). This is not to say that a person who ascribes to a modernist approach is entirely and/or completely tossed by the winds of change. Rather, it merely indicates a worldview that is more cognizant and places a higher level of importance upon the way in which current definitions and understandings can impact upon the way in which their worldview is constrained and develops. Conversely, an individual who ascribes to something of a fundamentalist viewpoint is one who is something of a literalist. Within such a way, fundamentalism, by its very nature, is a separatist doctrine that seeks to separate itself from the mainstream and hearken back to a prior interpretation of the doctrines or teachings of a particular world view/faith. As such, it will be the express intent of this brief analysis to discuss the means by which fundamentalism is by very nature an anti-modern philosophy/approach to any given world view. One of the primary definitions of fundamentalism that is referenced throughout many of the belief systems in the world is the fact that they invariably ascribe to the belief that the â€Å"truth† has become adulterated within the modern era and it is necessary to hearken back to a time of prior truth and purity in order to fulfill whatever directive a deity or group of deities might have set forth for them in a simpler and more pure time. This is true regardless of whether one examines an Islamic fundamentalist group or whether one examines a Hindu or Christian fundamentalist group. As such, a further appreciation and definition of the word â€Å"fundamentalist† leads one to realize that the fundamentals of a given faith or worldview are the prized possession that these indi viduals are fully unwilling to part with (Zizek, 1989). Those that ascribe to the fundamentals, those who define what are they based upon a narrow and historical interpretation of a key set of beliefs, question the means by which society and/or culture of the times can help to better them or the faith to which they ascribe. As such, fundamentalists, regardless of their particular variety, are inherently and entirely anti-modern. However, another key element of the fundamentalist worldview is not only the fact that they seek to disengage with modern society and return/recluse back to a prior interpretation of the mores and beliefs of a particular faith. Such a pattern of behavior would not make them anti modern and would not ensure that they came into any level of conflict with those within society that did not ascribe to a limited view of reality (Ball, 2010). Rather, they are invariably interested in alerting others to the ills of modernity and instructing them that the best means of assuring a further level of happiness and/or salvation is to disengage with the modern society and revert back to a literal or figurative interpretation of the means by which a given belief system was understood within the distant or not so distant past. It is this very attitude of disengagement and seeking to encourage or demand that others disengage that is perhaps the strongest argument for the fact that these individuals are invariably anti-modern in their interpretation o